Death Every Afternoon is about a French documentary called The
Bullfight (La course de taureaux 1951). The piece is not very long but it is of interest for two reasons. First because it is a celebration of the
art of editing, relevant since Bazin is often thought of as being against editing, and second because it is a formulation of Bazin’s ideas
about death’s relationship with cinema.
The review begins with an appreciation of Myriam Borsoutsky’s skills
as an editor. Among the films on which she worked Bazin mentions another documentary, Paris 1900 (1947) and The Story of a Cheat (Sacha Guitry 1936). She also worked on a number of other films by Guitry. After emphasising the brilliance of the editing, Bazin
declares that “[w]hen it is good, the art of the editor goes well beyond its
usual function – it is an essential element in the film’s creation”, but he makes the distinction between the Russian form of montage and
his own preference for découpage. Whereas montage is based on the idea of
symbolism and, as Bazin puts it, “the collision of images”, in The Bullfight the aim of the editing is realism and to
“fulfil both the physical verisimilitude of the découpage and its logical
malleability.” Here it is not a case of contrasting images to create new
effects out of the very collision but instead of having complementary editing,
where one image grows naturally out of its predecessor and in turn grows
naturally into its successor, and the technique is based on “precision and
clarity”.
As is only to be expected from Bazin, what he praises here
is the way realism is heightened by way of editing. Although he has primarily
written about the long take and deep focus, seamless editing is also shown to be able to serve the same master, the much vaunted realism. It is worth pointing out that Bazin's heroes, such as Wyler, Renoir, Welles and Fellini, cut more frequently than you might think, or that Bazin seems to remember. While he is right to argue that editing is " an essential element in the film’s creation" I think he is wrong in suggesting that it is only when it is particularly good. Editing is always an essential part, good or bad.
Bazin then goes on to discuss death and its relation with
cinema, even its profound centrality in the medium’s being. He suggests that death “is surely one of those rare events that justifies the term /…/ cinematic specificity.” This is partly
because cinema is the “[a]rt of time”, and not only “aesthetic time” but “lived
time”, and he refers to Henri Bergson’s concept of la durée. The
point he wants to make is that on film, death, unlike in the
real world, is not a unique, once-in-a-life-time event. As soon as a death is
captured on film, in moving images, it can be repeated over and over again. For Bazin, death, and
sex, is something unique and special, and something which can never be
represented, only experienced. With cinema having the capacity to show death,
and then also resurrect the dead, as well as show the same person dying again
and again, our treatment of death, and perhaps relationship to it, has changed
because “nowadays we can desecrate and show at will the only one of our
possessions that is temporally inalienable: dead without a requiem, the eternal
dead-again of the cinema!”
And of course, it is only natural that such a discussion
should arise from a film about bullfighting, where not only bulls but matadors
are killed, and death, perhaps the art of death, is what the game is about.
Bazin ends the article with the following statement: “On the screen, the
toreador dies every afternoon.”
Reading Bazin #5 is here.
-----------------------------------------------------
A companion piece to Bazin's article is Pier Paolo Pasolini's Observations of the Long Take from 1967.
Henri Decaë, who would later be cinematographer on several of the most important films if the French New Wave was also cinematographer on The Bullfight, together with Jimmy Berliet.
The exact meaning of the word découpage has been elusive, and frequently misunderstood, but it can be said to mean the organic relationship of all shots, how they all contribute to the overall effect, which should be the "physical verisimilitude". Hence to equate découpage with editing, as has often been done, is missing the larger picture (literally). Découpage can exist already in the filmmaker's head prior to shooting, and can be written into the script.
-----------------------------------------------------
A companion piece to Bazin's article is Pier Paolo Pasolini's Observations of the Long Take from 1967.
Henri Decaë, who would later be cinematographer on several of the most important films if the French New Wave was also cinematographer on The Bullfight, together with Jimmy Berliet.
The exact meaning of the word découpage has been elusive, and frequently misunderstood, but it can be said to mean the organic relationship of all shots, how they all contribute to the overall effect, which should be the "physical verisimilitude". Hence to equate découpage with editing, as has often been done, is missing the larger picture (literally). Découpage can exist already in the filmmaker's head prior to shooting, and can be written into the script.